Let’s say I wanted to write an article about how a local tax in a South Carolina town might effect local residents. I wouldn’t give that article a sweeping title implying residents of Massachusetts or Texas might face the task. Well, I’m not a writer nor an editor for the Wall Street Journal.
In an article by the Wall Street Journal’s Laura Sanders, she writes “How the New Wealth Taxes Will Hit You“. That would be a pretty short article. The answer is, they don’t. She’s talking about families raking in more than a quarter of a million dollars annually (or laughably, families whose only income comes from stocks! Yeah this is certainly geared towards the common man).
The language used in the headline plays into a couple conservative myths:
- Obama is raising taxes – Not for the majority of the population, in fact they are lower.
- Taxes on the wealthy will somehow impact the average voter. Nope.
Using slick tricks like this to spread conservative propaganda shows how compromised the Wall Street Journal’s journalistic integrity is, and how weak the conservative economic platform is. It just won’t sell without a dollop of snake oil.